Not an HMSThe revenue layer above the one you already run — orchestration for hospitals, health aggregation for employers.See the difference →
Sign inGo to my accountStart freeGo to my account
Booking page For doctors For hospitals Corporate health Health packages Labs Pharmacy Nadi Compare Free tools Referrals Claim help
Home › Platform › For Clinical Directors
For Clinical Directors

Performance conversations that clinicians accept.

Clinical performance discussions fail when they rely on impressions or on revenue alone. Drapto measures activity, contribution and patient satisfaction together, so the ranking is one clinicians are willing to look at.

NADI · CLINICAL
● Documentation at point of care
● Query rate watched
● Burden added none
✓ evidence without burden
Start freeGo to my account See all modules
A consultant's payout screen: the month's share itemised, two pending collections held out with the reason on the line, and the total reconciled against what was collected
The payout a consultant actually sees — every line reconciled against a collection, the held-out lines carrying their reason. Illustration drawn from the interface.

Your first screen

Every item here is a record that is incomplete. That it also costs money is the second thing wrong with it.

Per clinicianConsultations, procedures
and follow-ups
WeightedSatisfaction, not
revenue alone
RankedWithin department,
not in isolation
TrendGrowth measured
over any period

Volume alone is the wrong measure. Everyone knows it.

A leaderboard built purely on revenue rewards throughput and quietly punishes careful care. That is why clinicians disengage from it — and why weighting satisfaction in is what makes the tool usable.

Activity and contribution, in department context

A consultation record
Department activity starts here — one record per encounter, signed.

Consultations, procedures and follow-ups counted per clinician, with revenue contribution ranked inside the department rather than across unrelated specialties.

  • Consultations, procedures and follow-ups per clinician
  • Revenue contribution ranked within department
  • Growth trends per clinician over any period
  • Consistent definitions across every location
Dr AlmeidaLeading within department
Rank 1
Dr WhitfieldFollow-up rate above average
Strong
Department contextCompared like with like
Fair
TrendMeasured over time
Tracked

Satisfaction weighted in, from real feedback

Patient satisfaction is drawn from actual feedback rather than anecdote, and weighted into the leaderboard so clinical quality counts alongside activity.

  • Patient satisfaction from real collected feedback
  • A satisfaction-weighted leaderboard, not a revenue race
  • Period comparison to separate a bad month from a trend
  • Role-based access so performance data is not open to all
SatisfactionFrom real feedback
Verified
LeaderboardWeighted, not revenue-only
Balanced
Period viewTrend, not snapshot
Contextual
AccessScoped by role
Controlled
Benefits

What changes for your team.

Reviews stop being personal

Shared, consistent numbers move the conversation from recollection to evidence.

Quality is protected

Weighting satisfaction means throughput alone does not win, which protects the care your reputation rests on.

Support arrives earlier

A declining trend surfaces while it can still be discussed rather than at year end.

Strong clinicians are visible

Contribution and growth make it clear who is carrying the department — useful at review and at retention time.

Questions

Straight answers.

Will clinicians accept being measured?

More readily when the measure is not purely financial. Weighting patient satisfaction is the difference between a tool clinicians check and one they resent.

Where does satisfaction data come from?

Real patient feedback collected through the system rather than occasional surveys or anecdote.

Is individual performance visible to everyone?

No. Role-based access controls who can see clinical performance data.

Can clinicians be compared across branches?

Yes, definitions are consistent group-wide, though ranking is presented within department for fairness.

Make clinical reviews evidence-based.

Start freeGo to my account Talk to us
Encrypted everywhereTraffic secured with TLS and data encrypted at rest.
Tenant isolationYour data is separated from every other account.
Full audit trailEvery sensitive action is logged, including support access.
Role-based accessStaff see only what their role should see.
Export freedomYour data exports whenever you want it.

Built to standards, not to a demo

ABDMABHA linking, consent flows
FHIR R4Records and claim bundles
NHCXBundles built & validated
DPDPConsent and purpose limitation
Indian data centresHosted in Indian data centres
Offline codingNo API key, no per-call cost

Built around what you actually do all day.

The screens you open every hour, not the ones in a demo.

See the screensBook a walkthrough