The assessment is in six weeks.
The evidence is in eleven places.
Most hospitals do the things NABH asks for. What they cannot do at short notice is prove it, because the proof lives in registers, WhatsApp, a shared drive and somebody’s memory.
Consent, timestamped
Recorded when it was taken, by whom, against which procedure. An assessor asks for a sample and you produce the sample rather than a policy about consent.
Medication reconciliation
What the patient came in on, what changed, and who decided. Written at the point of the decision, not at discharge.
Incidents, reported and closed
An incident register nobody adds to is worse than none. Reporting has to be two taps and non-punitive, or you get a clean register and an unsafe hospital.
Rounds that count as a record
Signed ward rounds with a named clinician are clinical documentation. Unsigned notes somebody may still be editing are not.
Sampled, not summarised
An assessor wants ten actual files, not a dashboard. Everything here produces the files.
What we do not claim
Drapto does not accredit anybody and is not affiliated with NABH. Accreditation is awarded by NABH on their assessment, not on our software.
The screen
683
604
79
31
79No evidence recorded against the elementcollect
31Evidence older than 90 daysrefresh
44Evidence exists, not mapped to a standardmap
12Manual upload where a record existsreplace
604Attached and currentready
Assembled from what the system already recorded. Nothing here is a document somebody wrote the week before the assessment.
An assessor wants ten files.
Not a dashboard. Consent timestamped, medication reconciliation written at the point of decision, rounds signed with a name.