Not an HMSThe revenue layer above the one you already run — orchestration for hospitals, health aggregation for employers.See the difference →

The assessment is in six weeks.
The evidence is in eleven places.

Most hospitals do the things NABH asks for. What they cannot do at short notice is prove it, because the proof lives in registers, WhatsApp, a shared drive and somebody’s memory.

NADI · MODULE
● Spine shared
● Rationale attached
● Ledger single
✓ one platform underneath
Bar chart of NABH chapter evidence readiness from 57 to 92 percent
Readiness the way an assessor sees it: chapter by chapter, as a percentage of evidence already filed where it should be.

Consent, timestamped

NABH evidence collected against the standard an assessor opens first
Evidence filed against the standard, so an assessor is answered from the screen.

Recorded when it was taken, by whom, against which procedure. An assessor asks for a sample and you produce the sample rather than a policy about consent.

Medication reconciliation

What the patient came in on, what changed, and who decided. Written at the point of the decision, not at discharge.

Incidents, reported and closed

An incident register nobody adds to is worse than none. Reporting has to be two taps and non-punitive, or you get a clean register and an unsafe hospital.

Rounds that count as a record

Signed ward rounds with a named clinician are clinical documentation. Unsigned notes somebody may still be editing are not.

Sampled, not summarised

An assessor wants ten actual files, not a dashboard. Everything here produces the files.

What we do not claim

Drapto does not accredit anybody and is not affiliated with NABH. Accreditation is awarded by NABH on their assessment, not on our software.

The screen

Assembled from what the system already recorded. Nothing here is a document somebody wrote the week before the assessment.

What runs without being asked

Improved most weeks
No AI key The waitlist

A cancellation is offered to the next person in order, with a window, until somebody takes it.

No AI key The follow-up chaser

Raised when the prescription is written, chased twice, then it stops. It does not nag.

No AI key Critical results

An abnormal value escalates after thirty minutes if nobody named has acknowledged it.

No AI key Claim risk

Twenty-four rules, scored before submission and sorted by exposure rather than raw risk.

No AI key Nadi, 24 commands

Ctrl-K from any screen. These are database queries, so they work offline and cost nothing.

Your key Free-text questions

Ask in your own words. Bring your own Anthropic or OpenAI key, or run Ollama on your hardware and nothing leaves the building.

We are deliberate about which is which. Most of what runs here is rules, not a model — because a rule is auditable, works when the connection drops, and cannot invent a figure. We build and improve both every week, and we will always tell you which one answered you.

Questions we are actually asked

Does Drapto make us NABH accredited?

No. Drapto does not accredit anybody and is not affiliated with NABH. Accreditation is awarded by NABH on their own assessment.

What does an assessor actually want?

Ten actual files, not a dashboard. Consent timestamped, medication reconciliation written at the point of decision, incidents reported and closed, and signed ward rounds with a named clinician.

An assessor wants ten files.

Not a dashboard. Consent timestamped, medication reconciliation written at the point of decision, rounds signed with a name.

Start with the half that pays for itself.

Corporate contracts first. The clinical side is an addition, never a precondition.