Not an HMSThe revenue layer above the one you already run — orchestration for hospitals, health aggregation for employers.See the difference →

Empanelling for a government scheme: the decision, honestly

Scheme volume is real and scheme rates are real. The decision is arithmetic plus cash-flow, not ideology.

BLOG · SCHEMES
● Format mechanism table
● Invented stats 0
● Figures worked arithmetic
✓ no figure without its working

Run the numbers on your own cases

Take your actual case mix, price it at scheme package rates, subtract your actual cost per case. Some specialties clear positively, some don’t. Empanelment can be selective where rules allow — the decision is per service line, not per hospital.

Cash-flow is the second question

Scheme settlement cycles differ from private cashless. Model the receivable days against your working capital honestly; a profitable rate with an unaffordable cycle is still unaffordable.

The empanelment worksheet, one line per question
ItemStandardConsequence / owner
Package-rate marginYour cost vs scheme rate, per lineFinance, per specialty
Settlement cycleDays receivable, modelledWorking capital plan
Verification workflowBeneficiary + biometric stepsDesk staffing
Package disciplineBooked package governs billingBilling training
Exclusion clarityWhat the scheme won’t payPatient communication

Volume has operational prerequisites

Scheme patients arrive with scheme documentation workflows: beneficiary verification, package booking, discharge protocols. The desk that isn’t staffed for the workflow converts good volume into denied files.

What to do on Monday

Worked examples on this page are illustrative arithmetic on stated assumptions, not measured market statistics.

Read the mechanism. Now check your own numbers.

Bring twenty settled claims, advices only, patient details redacted. We name the clause behind each reduction and you keep the findings.