Not an HMSThe revenue layer above the one you already run — orchestration for hospitals, health aggregation for employers.See the difference →

Rate-card versioning: one price, provably applied

When tariffs change, the treatment date decides the price. Systems that overwrite history bill wrong both ways.

BLOG · CLAIMS OPS
● Format mechanism table
● Invented stats 0
● Figures worked arithmetic
✓ no figure without its working

The overwrite bug

Updating a price in place means every open file silently re-prices. Yesterday’s admission bills at today’s rate; disputes follow in both directions. Versioned rate cards — effective-dated, never overwritten — make every bill reconstructible.

Payer cards drift apart

Each payer contract amends independently. The hospital running “one master card with exceptions in someone’s head” is the hospital whose billing depends on who is on shift. Every payer gets its own dated card in the system.

Versioning rules that end price archaeology
ItemStandardConsequence / owner
Effective datingEvery change carries a from-dateNo silent re-pricing
Version retentionOld cards never deletedHistory reconstructible
Per-payer cardsContract amendments isolatedCross-payer bleed stops
Treatment-date pricingSystem picks the versionShift-independent billing
Change logWho, when, whatAudit in one query

The audit answer

“Why this price?” should be answerable in one query: card version X, effective date Y, treatment date Z. If the answer requires narrative, the next deduction is already scheduled.

What to do on Monday

Worked examples on this page are illustrative arithmetic on stated assumptions, not measured market statistics.

Read the mechanism. Now check your own numbers.

Bring twenty settled claims, advices only, patient details redacted. We name the clause behind each reduction and you keep the findings.