An enhancement request needs time to be approved. Raising it when the bill reaches the approved amount leaves none, so the threshold that actually works is around 85 percent of approved.
What sets it off.
A stay extends or a procedure is added. The approved amount was set on the original clinical picture and no longer fits.
Hospitals typically discover this at 100 percent because that is when the system flags it — which is the flag being set at the wrong point, not a process failure.
What you need in the file.
The clinical justification for the extension, dated, from the treating doctor. An enhancement raised without it is a number without a reason and gets queried.
Also the original approval, showing what was covered — enhancements are assessed against the original scope.
The minute where it is still fixable.
Move the threshold to 85 percent of approved. That is not a tighter rule; it is the same rule set where it can still work.
Then track running bill against approved amount continuously rather than at discharge, so the flag fires while the patient is still admitted.
Why the flag sits in the wrong place
Most systems compare the running bill against the approved amount and alert on breach. That is the correct comparison at the wrong threshold: it fires when the problem has already happened.
Illustrative. The approved amount is whatever the pre-authorisation set; the percentages are of that figure.
An enhancement typically needs days to be decided. Firing at 100 percent means the amount above the approval is unfunded for the whole of that period, and if the decision goes against you it stays unfunded.
Eighty-five percent is not a stricter rule. It is the same rule placed where acting on it still changes the outcome.
What a good enhancement contains
Dated clinical justification from the treating doctor explaining what changed — a complication, an extension, an added procedure. An enhancement that presents only a number gets queried and loses more days.
The original approval, so the payer can assess the request against its scope. Enhancements are judged against what was originally covered, not against the new total.
And the running bill at the point of request, which demonstrates the request was made before the ceiling rather than after it. That timing is itself evidence of a controlled process.
The patient-facing version of this ground, for handing to a family: claim help. The mechanism in full: every way an Indian payer reduces a claim.
Questions we get asked
Why 85 percent?
Because an enhancement needs time to be decided. Raising it at the ceiling leaves none, and the amount above the approval is then unfunded.
What does an enhancement need?
Dated clinical justification from the treating doctor, assessed against the scope of the original approval.
Find these in your own settled claims
Twenty claims you have already settled, classified by ground, split into predictable and unexplained. About an hour of your team’s time.