Not an HMSThe revenue layer above the one you already run — orchestration for hospitals, health aggregation for employers.See the difference →

AYUSH treatment claims: what standard policies actually pay

IRDAI pushed AYUSH into mainstream coverage. The claims fail on institutional criteria, not on the medicine.

BLOG · PAYER MECHANICS
● Format mechanism table
● Invented stats 0
● Figures worked arithmetic
✓ no figure without its working

Coverage attaches to the institution

Post-2024 standardisation, AYUSH inpatient treatment is broadly covered — when delivered in facilities meeting the policy’s criteria: registration, bed strength, qualified practitioners. The claim is won or lost on your registrations, not on the therapy.

Inpatient logic still applies

Coverage is for admissions, and admissions must justify themselves: why inpatient, what protocol, what daily record. Wellness stays dressed as treatment fail; documented therapeutic admissions with daily notes pass.

The AYUSH claim file, assembled once, attached always
ItemStandardConsequence / owner
Institutional registrationCurrent certificate on fileAttach with every claim
Practitioner qualificationsRegistration numbers documentedStanding annexure
Admission justificationInpatient indication statedTreating practitioner note
Daily therapy recordSession log with timesWard file
Discharge protocolOutcome and advice recordedSummary

The documentation set differs

Practitioner registration numbers, therapy session logs, and institutional certificates travel with AYUSH claims in a way allopathic files don’t require. Assemble the standing set once; attach it always.

What to do on Monday

Worked examples on this page are illustrative arithmetic on stated assumptions, not measured market statistics.

Read the mechanism. Now check your own numbers.

Bring twenty settled claims, advices only, patient details redacted. We name the clause behind each reduction and you keep the findings.