Not an HMSThe revenue layer above the one you already run — orchestration for hospitals, health aggregation for employers.See the difference →

The eight reasons Indian pre-authorisations come back

Most rejections are documentation failures, not clinical disagreements — which means most are preventable before sending.

BLOG · PAYER MECHANICS
● Format mechanism table
● Invented stats 0
● Figures worked arithmetic
✓ no figure without its working

Payer mechanicsIndiaUpdated Jul 2026

In short

Indian pre-authorisation rejections cluster into eight causes: incomplete documentation, missing prior authorisation, identity mismatch, policy not active on the date of admission, condition inside a waiting period, pre-existing disease exclusion, non-network provider, and tariff or package mismatch. Only a minority are genuine clinical disputes.

The eight

Documentation incomplete — a named investigation, consultation note or estimate missing.

Prior authorisation absent where the procedure required it separately from admission approval.

Identity mismatch between the policy, the ID produced and the patient record.

Policy inactive on the admission date, including lapsed premium.

Waiting period, common for specific procedures in the first two to four years of a policy.

Pre-existing disease exclusion, the most contested category.

Non-network provider, where the hospital is outside the payer's panel for that product.

Tariff or package mismatch against the contract on file.

Why sending anyway is expensive

A pre-authorisation that will fail on documentation costs a cycle — usually days — during which the admission is already running and the family is waiting for an answer.

Blocking the send and naming the missing item converts a multi-day round trip into a five-minute correction.

The rule that should never fire

When a fact is unknown, no rule should fire. A missing tariff on file is not evidence of a tariff mismatch, and a system that treats absence as a red flag trains people to ignore it.

Questions we get asked

What is the most common pre-auth rejection reason in India?

Incomplete documentation — a required investigation report, consultation note or cost estimate missing from the submission.

Can a rejected pre-authorisation be resubmitted?

Usually yes, with the deficiency corrected, though the delay can push an admission past its notification window.

Built to international standards. Sold in India only, for now.

Drapto is engineered the way any serious international health platform is — FHIR R4, audit trails, Indian data residency — and sold exclusively to Indian clinics and hospitals, so the payer mechanics, scheme rates and clinical vocabulary are modelled rather than approximated.

Built to standards, not to a demo

ABDMABHA linking, consent flows
FHIR R4Records and claim bundles
NHCXBundles built & validated
DPDPConsent and purpose limitation
Indian data centresHosted in Indian data centres
Offline codingNo API key, no per-call cost

The mechanism above, on your own numbers.

Nothing on this page is a promise. Bring a month of settlements and we will read them with you.